Tuesday, 15 April 2008

Henninger on Fiorentino on Rimini

Francesco Fiorentino's book Gregorio da Rimini: Contingenza, futuro e scienza nel pensiero tardo-medievale (2004) is riddled with errors.  For example, here is n. 16 on p. 9 of the introduction:

‘C. Normore, Peter Aureoli and his contemporaries on future contingents and the excluded middle, "Synthèse", 96 (1993), pp. 83-92.  Nel 1999 C. Normore è ritornato sul tema secondo una prospettiva più ampia; cf. C. Normore, Contingenti futuri, in La logica nel Medioevo, The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, a cura di N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg, Milano 1999.’

An attentive reader working on future contingents will immediately spot three mistakes in this one footnote.  The first two are comparatively insignificant: the title of Normore's article begins with ‘Petrus’ and does not contain the definite article.  The third is more worrying: the CHLMP was published in 1982, so Normore's 1993 article appeared after his CHLMP chapter, but Fiorentino (presumably using a 1999 translation) tells us that in the latter Normore ‘returned to the theme from a wider perspective’.  The worrying thing is that the CHLMP has been the standard handbook of mediaeval philosophy since its appearance over 25 years ago.

Both author and publisher deserve a rap on the knuckles, so I was pleased to discover that Mark Henninger had already reviewed the book in Gregorianum.  Pleased, that is, until I read the review.

Henninger is grateful for ‘certain logical principles he wisely provides in the introduction [actually Chapter 1]: the principle of bivalence, i.e., in whatever statement, either its affirmation or its negation is true; the law of contradictories, i.e., for every affirmative statement there exists its contradictory, and vice versa’.  Unfortunately, both of these are more or less obvious howlers on Fiorentino's part.

If the meaning of ‘bivalence’ in a logical context is not clear enough from the etymology, even a standard dictionary will define it as the existence of only two truth-values, the corresponding principle being that every statement is either true or false.  Worse, Fiorentino goes on (p. 24 n. 23) to cite Łukasiewicz's insistence on distinguishing between the principle of bivalence and the law of excluded middle.  A reader following this up will be astonished, given Fiorentino's formulation, to read on p. 82 of Łukasiewicz, Aristotle's Syllogistic: ‘…the so-called principle of bivalence, which states that every proposition is either true or false, i.e. that it has one and only one of two possible truth-values: truth and falsity.  This principle must not be mixed up with the law of the excluded middle, according to which of two contradictory propositions one must be true.’

As for the law of contradictories, Fiorentino refers only to Aristotle, De int. 9, 18a28-31.  The reader following this up will find a discussion of the truth or falsity of an affirmation and its corresponding negation – not the mere assertion that there is a corresponding negation.  And I think the reader checking in Rimini and Auriol will find that the law of contradictories is that if one part of a contradictory pair is false then the other part is true (Rimini), or vice versa (Auriol).

Henninger's verdict is that ‘Fiorentino provides a well-researched, thorough and balanced investigation of the teaching of Gregory of Rimini … In the introduction, Fiorentino sets the context with a helpful historiography of the problem of future contingents and divine foreknowledge as treated mostly by researchers in the last century, as well as a survey of the literature on Gregory of Rimini. … This is a fine work by a fine scholar.’

Sadly, then, Fiorentino's book still awaits a properly critical review.

2 comments:

VTazdecor said...

Như chúng ta đã biết công việc tại văn phòng luôn gắn liền với chiếc bàn làm việc hcm cho nên việc chọn mua mẫu bàn làm việc nào cho phù hợp với nhu cầu khả năng sử dụng của nhân viên tại văn phòng luon được các nhà quản lý quan tâm tới chính vì thế cho nên đối với mẫu mã thì ban van phong có những tiêu chuẩn như thế nào để chọn lựa cùng chúng tôi tìm hiểu qua chia sẻ sau:
- Đầu tiên phải nói đến diện tích: Bàn văn phòng tiêu chuẩn có kích thước mặt bàn là 1.2m x 60cm và chiêù cao chuẩn là 75cm tuy nhiên tuỳ theo diện tích văn phòng mà chúng ta có thể linh động kích thước nhưng phải đảm bảo kích thuớ tối thiểu
- Kế đến là chỗ để máy tính: Bàn phải đáp dứng được cả không gian cho việt để máy bàn và Laptop
- Không gian để chân: Một chiếc bàn thoải mái phải có không gian để chân phù hợp giúp người ngồi có thể cảm thấy thoải mái
- Không gian chứa đồ: Không phải lúc nào bạn cũng mang tài liệu, hay những vật dụng tại công ty về nhà và vì thế cần phải có không gian để cất chúng.
Trên là một trong các tiêu chuẩn chủ đạo khi có nhu cầu chọn mua bàn làm việc dành cho văn phòng nhằm mang lại cho bạn sự lựa chọn đứng đắn trong khi trên thị trường nội thất văn phòng có nhiều đa số sản phẩm nội thất nhiều mẫu mã, kích thước, chất liệu, màu sắc...khiến bạn khó có thể chọn được mẫu bàn đúng với mục đích và nhu cầu sử dụng.

阿童木 said...

The Cartier watch is advised to replica watches uk action added than just a watch. Breeding and composure are absolutely requirements of these around-the-clock architecture standards. The Cartier watch generally becomes an antique of its owner, anesthetized own through the ancestors to come. You can acquisition your Cartier Watch in modern, classic, and awakening styles. There's even an accustomed Cartier watch with roman numerals, alligator strap, and as with all Cartier watches their cast azure on the bulge as able-bodied as azure ablaze faces to abide scratching. Book your differnet apropos this calm with brainwash you on how you can admonish this Maurice Lacroix watches,mont blanc watches,omega watches,swiss movado replica watches. But if any one appears to be concern'd at our Upbraiding him with his Accustomed Deformity, which did not appear by his own Fault, but seems to be the Curse of God aloft him; we admiration that Getting to consider, that this little Monster has upbraided Humans with their Calamities and their Diseases, and Calamities and Diseases which are either apocryphal or past, or which he himself gave them by rolex replica , administering Poison to them. On 30 June Curll brought out Pope's bearding (and smutty) Roman Catholick Adaptation of the Aboriginal Psalm, to could could cause added accident to Pope's 'fame'. Yet punishment, as a accessible act, has what ability be alleged articulate features, and admitting Curll persisted in his adapted activities, there is a faculty in which the ability at ample and chastening amends in particular, adopted Pope's adaptation of the script. Curll was again subjected to added instances of 'justice', official and otherwise. The appellation page of Cloister Balladry angry the balladry to issues of the accomplished accent at 'court' by alluding to the 'Last Day of the Lord Winton's TryaP, that is, the balloon of the Jacobite abettor the fifth Earl of Wintoun, which concluded with a 'guilty' adjudication on 19 March 1716 . On 10 April Curll appear through Sarah Popping (one of the declared agents of Pope's Abounding and True Account) An Account of the Tryal of the Earl of Winton, for which aperture of official advertisement rights Curll and Popping were arrested a few canicule later; Curll was not appear afore he had knelt afore the bar of the House of Lords to accept a reprimand, about a ages later. The event, with its ritual humiliation, food some of rolex replica Please accept that Replica Watches will bolt all the eyes!
---------------------------------------------------------